The Sun-Times Media Group
description of the August 2007 distribution agreement with the
Chicago Tribune: "the Company entered into a contract with the
Chicago Tribune Company for home delivery and suburban sing-copy
delivery of the Chicago Sun-Times and most of its suburban
publications. The Company will continue to distribute single-copy
editions of the Chicago Sun-Times within the city of Chicago and
will also continue to operate the circulation sales and billing
functions with the exception of single copy billing in the
suburbs.
"The Company has completed the
transfer of distribution activities to Chicago Tribune Company.
Approximately 60 full and part-time positions were eliminated as a
result…
"As of December 31, 2007, the
Company (had) 278… circulation staff."
From the 2006 annual report to
shareholders: "As of December 31, 2006, the Company had… 309
circulation staff."
Why is there a difference of about
30 positions? Because the Sun-Times Media Group is counting only
full-time positions in its census. In its savings it is also
counting part-time positions.
Here is a table, showing the
statement of staffing from 2006 and from
2007:
|
Function |
2006 |
2007 |
Change |
% |
|
Part-Time |
401 |
273 |
-128 |
-31.92% |
|
Full-Time |
2440 |
2569 |
129 |
5.29% |
|
Production |
560 |
598 |
38 |
6.79% |
|
Sales &
Marketing |
576 |
637 |
61 |
10.59% |
|
Circulation |
309 |
278 |
-31 |
-10.03% |
|
General &
Administrative |
236 |
282 |
46 |
19.49% |
|
Editorial |
738 |
753 |
15 |
2.03% |
|
Facilities |
21 |
21 |
0 |
0.00% |
|
Union |
1052 |
965 |
-87 |
-8.27% |
|
Non-Union |
1789 |
1877 |
88 |
4.92% |
|
TOTAL |
2841 |
2842 |
1 |
0.04% |
According to this summary of
full-time employees only, from the annual report, the editorial
staff increased, year over year. Really? But that's at odds with
statements coming out of the company. And, the biggest increase in
employment levels was in general and administrative staffings.
G&A-- they don't produce ads, editorial or newspaper sales. Yet
there are 46 more of them at year end than a year
ago.
It is no wonder this turnaround is
so disappointing.
Circulation showed the largest
decline, year over year. But it also raises a big question. Half of
the elimination was part-time staff. I believe about ten of the
remaining thirty were teamster drivers. If all the circulation
function, except sales, billing and union drivers are outsourced,
why hasn't this figure fallen further?
An argument could be made that the
Chicago Sun-Times, which sells 59 percent of its copies through
street sales or single copy sales, actually needs more teamsters,
not less. Did circulation protect its own in this outsourcing with
the Chicago Tribune?
Recall, too, that this company
outsourced its customer relations department, is that part of
circulation too?


Discuss