Donatenow

Researchers expand Chicago River environmental study

  • By Alex Parker
  • Staff Writer
  • March 24, 2009 @ 9:00 AM

Researchers are looking for 3,000 more volunteers -- on top of the 7,000 they've already recruited -- to expand a study of the health effects of activities such as boating, canoeing, kayaking and fishing on Chicago's waterways.

The University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health launched the study with $3.75-million in funding in 2007, and researchers recently got another $4.3-million to expand the scope of their work.

They hope their study will be completed by the end of the year. 

The study is funded by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. It is linked to the district's effort to avoid disinfecting treated sewage before it is discharged into the Chicago River system.

The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency recommended disinfection after conducting a five-year study to review existing and potential uses of the river.  The study found more people than ever are using the river for recreation.

District officials say installing and operating disinfection equipment would cost nearly $1 billion over 20 years. Further, they say, there’s no proof disinfection will cut illnesses among people exposed to river water.

 “We don’t know if people are getting sick by coming in contact with this water, or how they’re getting sick,” Superintendent Richard Lanyon said in an interview last year. “If you don’t know, how can you say that spending a lot of money to provide bacterial treatment is going to provide a benefit? “

Dr. Samuel Dorevitch, the study’s top investigator, says his team is looking to see if people using the city’s waterways are getting gastrointestinal or skin infections, and eye, ear or respiratory conditions.

Participants will be studied before and after they use the waterways. In a new part of the study, Dorevitch will measure the amount of water that some participants swallow or inhale, as well as how much water gets splashed on them.

Researchers will study water samples to identify pathogens that cause disease. Other studies have only looked at indicators of pollution, Dorevitch says.

“It’s not usually E. coli that makes people sick,” he says. “But the presence of E. coli in the water indicates that there may be sewage contamination.”

Dorevitch and his team will begin recruiting additional participants at various events starting in April. For more information, including how to participate, visit the study’s Web site, www.cheerschicago.org.

 

Daily News Staff Writer Alex Parker covers public health. He can be reached at 773.362.5002, ext. 17, or alex [at] chitowndailynews [dot] org.

The Daily News spent $283 reporting, writing and editing this article. We need your help to continue providing great local news coverage. Please donate today.

Discuss

GEOFF DOUGHERTY, 03-26-2009

Jill,

Thanks for your comment.

If you let us know what specific factual errors you see in the article, we'd be happy to correct them.

Are you saying the district is actually in favor of disinfection?

JILL HORIST, 03-26-2009

It is specifically wrong – on many levels -- that in a news report of a public health study call for volunteers that the District funded project would be editorialized and refered to as an “effort to avoid disinfecting treated sewage before it is discharged into the Chicago River system.”. The District is highly skilled in science, research and civil and technical engineering in relation to the artifically controlled, man-made Chicago Area Waterway System,(CAWS) its development and care. Repeatedly, without fail, it remains the position of the District to let science lead the way. The treated effluent that we return to the canal is 98% clean as it heads toward the Mississippi watershed. Additional bacterial treatment to this system, which function is still to convey treated wastewater, urban drainage and goods, could be unnecessary in balance of the science, economics and yes, even the environment. Our modeling studies show that additional treatment will create even greater green house gas emissions and cause a larger carbon footprint. This is not an emotional issue. This is not, “saving the river”. This is not a natural waterway. While it can be construed as a “second lakefront,” it certainly has no and never will have beaches. It is, however, a testimony to the District, its staff, and leadership that the quality of the waterway today is such that people are drawn to its manufactured banks. What they are looking at and wanting to recreate on remains unequivocalbly 70% treated effluent. The remaining 30% is untreated storm runoff, rainfall, and a modest amount of lake water used to flush the system. The District is committed in its stewardship of maintaining a civic amenity that provides for public health and economic needs. The District is one of the original “green” activists in our ever continuing pursuit of improving the quality of the CAWS. It would be greatly appreciated if the public were given correct and verified information.

Jill Horist, Public Affairs Manager, MWRDGC

Comments for this article are now closed

69

E-MAIL headlines

Our Daily News headlines service brings you Chicago's best local news coverage every morning. From education to transit, housing, and block-by-block neighborhood reports, we've got it covered!