Lou Piniella fell into the national dialogue about instant
replay when he commented on the announcement that it would finally
grace baseball this Thursday. He wasn't for it, but I sure am.
Knowing that there are still several ways and possible
Bartman-like instants where the Cubs could see another playoff run
ripped away from them, I'd preferred to have some of those covered
by instant replay.
Lou's argument is pretty much the only valid one: time.
Baseball is a long sport that if you sit down and watch for nine
innings you pretty much can't get up and physically do something
the rest of the day. That and umps are always trying to speed up
the game. Add instant replay and then you have to take more time
reviewing a play that might be inconclusive anyway. But
in an era where baseball has been
questioned for its integrity, instant replay will do marvels
for this business.
There are so many blown calls in baseball, that at the least,
homerun calls, where actual runs are on the line and umps are
furthest away form the play in question, should no doubt be the
first. Perhaps they should be the only. As time goes on, there will
undoubtedly be calls for more things to be "challengeable" to use a
football term. However, as baseball is a game that is so deeply
affected by time and which the manager has so much control already
over the pace of the game, there may not be any more room for
it.
While time will tell about the effectiveness of replay, it is
time that baseball deliver the level of truth that has been
demanded of it in this digital age. The players and fans deserve it
at least in this much and I hope fans of baseball everywhere will
look back to 8/28/08 an a milestone day in Major League
Baseball.
Discuss
Please log in or register to post your comment.