Rss

Ravings from the editor

Geoff

Daily News editor Geoff Dougherty blabs about journalism, the Daily News and assorted other subjects

How we're going to spend all that cash

By Geoff Dougherty | May 29, 12:35 PM

So... $340,000. Lots of dough for a formerly destitute non-profit news organization.

When I posted the article about our Knight Foundation grant, I was in Miami for the announcement, racing from event to event and struggling with limited Internet access. So I didn't have much opportunity to give our readers and contributors the details on exactly what we're going to do with the money, and how it's going to impact the Daily News and everyone involved with the site.

Here goes:

We will use the grant funding to recruit, train and deploy a highly structured network of volunteer journalists to produce a comprehensive and professional daily local news report.

By creating a network that includes at least one citizen journalists in each of Chicago's 70+ neighborhoods, we believe we can offer local news coverage that is more comprehensive, nuanced and diverse than the report found in Chicago's large daily newspapers. We expect our approach will substantially increase the volume of news coverage in Chicago's most disadvantaged neighborhoods, and create a large number of trained journalists in those communities.

This project is especially cool because it pushes the boundaries for citizen journalism. While some news organizations (the BBC, OhMyNews) have launched ambitious citizen journalism efforts, nobody has attempted to create an organized, cohesive system that enables coverage of a large city. We'll be the first.

Relying on citizen journalists to write articles on whatever topic interests them -- the approach taken by most sites -- yields a patchwork of coverage that, while interesting, contains large gaps. We plan to address that issue by structuring our network along the lines of a traditional newsroom. Editors will consult with writers on each neighborhood beat to ensure that key events and issues are covered, and edit the resulting stories to meet rigorous accuracy and objectivity standards.

We're also in the process of working with some prominent journalism educators to create a Journalism 101 program that will quickly bring our citizen journalists up to speed on basic reporting, writing and photography techniques.

Obviously this program is going to be great for the Daily News, and for Chicago residents. It's also likely to serve as a model for other citizen journalism outlets, and conventional news organizations looking to improve their local coverage.

Now, on to the nuts and bolts. As soon as we receive the grant funds, we'll be hiring at least one community outreach specialist, and we'll be adding more as time goes by. These folks will be showing up at block committee meetings, neighborhood Chamber of Commerce events, churches and festivals to talk with residents about writing for the Daily News.

Again, the objective is to sign up at least one person from each city neighborhood. We'll be starting with a pilot group of neighborhoods this year -- probably two or three dozen of them along the lakefront, evenly split between North Side and South Side. Once we get the kinks worked out, we'll move into other neighborhoods during the second year of the grant.

Once we have residents signed up, we'll begin rolling out the training program, and hiring editors to work with our new citizen journalists.

At the same time, we'll debut a new feature on the website: A neighborhood-by-neighborhood calendar of upcoming events and issues that our citizen journalists and editors can use to plan coverage.

Obviously we've got a lot of work ahead of us. It's going to be an exciting and challenging two years for the Daily News.

There's a few things you can do to help us make this effort a success. If you're interested in writing for us, drop me a line at geoff (at) chitowndailynews (dot) org.

If you're an experienced editor or have some expertise in community organizing and are interested in working for us on this project, I'd like to talk with you.

And if you know of other foundations or individuals who might be interested in sponsoring the program, please let me know. The Knight Foundation is funding about 60 percent of the program in our first year, so we need to rev up our fundraising efforts to pay for the remaining 40 percent.



Tagged: the Loop, The Loop

Comments

DON SAMUELSON, 08-19-2007

Oops. Sorry for typos. Should have checked.

DON SAMUELSON, 08-19-2007

Good engaged exchahges for two weeks. Then nothing since 6/14/07. People pay money to go to schoool to learn skills. Peace Corps Volunteeers earn sugbsistence income for two years. In both cases, the individual is trading experience for income. In this age of Journalism 2.0, the skills that could be learned in covering neighborhood news could teach valuable communication skills that would have value after the investment period. Volunteering could be a good investment IF the training was of high quality, and perceived as such by future employers.

AARO, 06-14-2007

Hi,
If you are going to do citizen journalism, let the citizens do it. Why do you need professors to tell what or how to do? I'm sure, that your team finds 75 volunteers, because here, in Kyyjarvi, is only 1.600 inhabitants and we have over 100 writers. All volunteers. The site is www.nopolanews.fi

GEOFF DOUGHERTY, 06-13-2007

Contrary's a pretty interesting read.

If I had to choose between writing for free and editing for free, based on the aggravation to fun ratio, I'd write for free.

PETER DUNNE, 06-12-2007

There's a Chicago-based magazine named Contrary (contrarymagazine.com) that pays its writers and its writers only. All the editors volunteeer. That model seems to work pretty well.

RESCUE 1, 06-06-2007

Congrats!

GEOFF DOUGHERTY, 06-05-2007

Bobzaguy,

Welcome to the site. We make all of our archives available free of charge, and do not hide them behind a registration wall. So there are articles up to 18 months old available here. However, our front page is updated pretty much every weekday. We usually try to update several times a day. So you won't find any articles from 6 months old on the front page, nor on most of the news section fronts. Older articles may turn up in our 'most viewed' and 'related' sections because they fit the bill -- they're popular or related.

As for retaining our volunteer journalists, there's lots of nonprofits that offer training and are then able to hang onto people afterward. When I was in high school and college, I volunteered at the local fire department. They gave me hundreds of hours of training, my EMT certification, and a bunch of skills that I easily could have used to get a full-time job. But I didn't, because I liked volunteering and I already had a job doing something else. I'm guessing there's a lot of people who will feel the same way about our program.

BOBZAGUY, 06-05-2007

This is my first time online here. I was a little surprised that, after being online for 18 months, you are featuring postings from January still in June! Seems that there isn't much going on here. An urban area of about 9 million people.

Then I see you have been "awarded" $300,000 + over 2 years to do more.
That's most certainly doing something right. Congratulations to you.

I have just read the various comments people are giving you here and your responses– one of which struck me somewhat– “...we want to avoid working with people who are going to view writing for us as a financial proposition”.

I think that you better publish your business plan very soon or stop trying to answer people's questions about it with such vague ideas.

What's vague you say? Well, over 2 years you propose to spend $340 grand on editors and professors who will "train" and “excel at working with new [volunteer] journalists...to help make their communities better places to live.”

You say you want people to "volunteer" their time and work in exchange for "$20,000 in training" from local professors; and "hundreds of thousands [for] hire[d] experienced editors who will excel at working with new journalists to produce great community reporting." Their “benefits” in exchange for their volunteer efforts to report for you.

So all the bucks go to paying to teach volunteers how to become writers.

You say “So the idea that we’re somehow taking advantage of people just doesn’t hold water.” And the people you are hiring will agree with you. At this point you haven’t taken advantage. But you have plans to. I just don’t think that it will happen.

What makes you think that you will have developed an ongoing group of “volunteers” once you have taught them how to make money by writing? Once these good people see that they can earn up to $1 a word for their writing efforts, I think most will go over to the paying side very quickly.

Thus leaving you with the same problem you currently have – featuring January news articles in June.

GEOFF DOUGHERTY, 06-03-2007

There are thousands of people in Chicago who volunteer every day to make their communities better places -- sweeping the floors at soup kitchens, counseling AIDS victims, tutoring disadvantaged children, answering phones at the public radio station. My guess is that very few of them spend time bitching that the nonprofit organization they volunteer for isn’t paying them adequately.

We are in exactly the same situation. We’re a nonprofit organization with an extremely limited budget, and we’re asking people to volunteer with us to help make their communities better places to live.

Indeed, the Daily News was conceived with the idea that separating news from financial concerns is of the utmost importance. The company doesn’t have shareholders, investors or profits. We exist solely to serve Chicago by giving residents the information they need to participate in the city’s civic life, and any revenue we receive gets plowed back into furthering that mission.

For that reason, we want to avoid working with people who are going to view writing for us as a financial proposition.

Further, I’d anticipate that most of the people who volunteer for these positions will not be experienced journalists accustomed to making $1 a word writing for the New Yorker. I expect most volunteers will be people who have never written a news article before, but are involved in their communities and would like to see better news coverage of them.

We will be offering substantial benefits to those people. We’re spending close to $20,000 on training them in conjunction with journalism professors at a local university. We’re spending hundreds of thousands to hire experienced editors who will excel at working with new journalists to produce great community reporting.

So the idea that we’re somehow taking advantage of people just doesn’t hold water.

JULIE, 06-02-2007

First, congratulations on the grant.

That said, forgive me for the following comments but your reply to Analisa regarding the pay issue is a copout. You're awarded well over a quarter million dollars to foster the jounalistic trade, yet unwilling to support the people who support it -- journalists. Bringing money into the equation brings up issues you'd rather avoid? How about the issue of it's kinda hard to write when you haven't eaten in a couple of days and you got thrown out of your partment because you coulnd't pay the rent? God, I'm sick of this "starving artist is the truest voice" excuse for not paying writers for the work they do. Of all the write-for-the-thrill-of-seeing-your-name-in-print-and-be-thankful-you-have-the-opportunity-to-be-published-at-all journals, blogs, periodicals, etc., none have impressed me as to the quality of, or passion behind, the writing.

Not to pay people for their work is wrong. It's time for all of us creative people - writers, photographers, videographers, painters, musicians, dancers, actors -- to stop groveling for work, to stop accepting the idea that our talents are monetarily worthless.

GEOFF DOUGHERTY, 05-30-2007

Analisa,

One of the best parts of this grant (other than the money, of course) is hearing from former coworkers I'd lost touch with.

The pay issue is something I'm wrestling with quite a bit.

I generally believe journalists are not adequately compensated for their work, and that good writers deserve good pay.

However, we've tried various compensation systems in the past -- $10 a story, $100 to the author of the most popular story every month -- and I can't say they make much of a difference in the number of people who write for us.

And once you bring money into the equation, it brings up a whole list of expectations and issues that I'd much rather avoid. We want the kind of people who are interested in writing for us because they're committed to making a difference in their communities, not people looking for a part-time job.

That said, one of the major aspects of this grant involves exploring methods of effectively recruiting and retaining citizen journalists, so we'll look at anything that helps us do that successfully.

ANALISA NAZARENO (MIAMI HERALD 1998-2001, 05-30-2007

Geoff,
Congratulations on this fabulous grant. Your project is a worthy experiment and I hope it succeeds. One thought -- don't you think if you and your board members are the only "journalists" getting paid that this "citizen journalism" network will be a low-budget and unsustainable endeavor? People like getting paid for their high-quality contributions -- at least a quarter a word or even 10-cents? Just a thought.


Please log in or register to post your comment.

38

Copyright 2005-2008 PublicMedia, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation | 5412 N. Clark, Suite 218, Chicago, IL 60640 | 773.362.5002 | editors (at) chitowndailynews (dot) org