Rss

Ravings from the editor

Geoff

Daily News editor Geoff Dougherty blabs about journalism, the Daily News and assorted other subjects

Profiting from death

By Geoff Dougherty | Oct 30, 11:24 AM

Frequent readers will notice that I haven't posted to the blog in several weeks. I was at the Online News Association conference (more on that later), and as I was heading back to Chicago I found out that my father had died of a heart attack.

In the 10 days since that happened, I've learned a few things about the intersection of the news biz and death.

First, obituaries are really important. I've probably written a few hundred in my career, and I doubt that I've given more than 10 minutes of thought to any of them.

But obits deserve more attention. They're rooted in the idea that everyone is entitled to a public accounting of their lives -- where they were born, whom they married, the children they raised and the jobs they held. It's an egalitarian process that gives everyone, even those who didn't make the newspaper while they were alive, their 15 minutes of fame.

A well-crafted obit, like the one Patricia Sullivan of the Washington Post wrote about my dad, distills and preserves the essence of that person for posterity. I'll read that obit in 20 years and it will likely remind me of things I'd forgotten about my father. A researcher who delves into Mel Fisher's fantastic treasure finds will know that my father was Mel's lawyer, and gain at least a smidgen of insight into his personality.

Obits also serve another function: Telling friends, neighbors and community members about the death, and letting them know when the services are.

Or at least that's the way it should happen. But too often these days, news organizations fall down on the job in this regard.

The Post's policy dictates that obits will not mention the time and date of the funeral service.

But the Post was far, far classier than the Bradford Era, the paper that covers my dad's hometown.

After I sent the Era some obit information, I got a call from a staffer there.

The paper would be happy to publish the fact that my father had passed away, and that he was born in Bradford. If I wanted the notice to contain information about his career and college attended, I'd have to purchase a 'deluxe' death notice. If I wanted information about my dad's survivors and the details about the memorial service to appear in his hometown paper, I'd have to buy the 'extended' notice, which was even more expensive.

I never imagined that a newspaper would be sleazy enough to base the information it publishes about a community member's death on the amount of money the survivors are willing to pay. It strikes me that the Post, too, is engaged in the same game, though to a lesser degree. If my family wants folks in D.C. to know about my dad's memorial service, we've got to buy a death notice.

Memo to publishers: If you want to be liked, respected and read in your community, stop viewing death as a profit center. For God's sake, don't try to upsell the bereaved when they contact you about an obit. Start serving your community. When one of your readers dies, write a decent obit about it -- one that includes information on his job, family, education, passions and accomplishments, and mentions the time, date and location of the memorial service.

If you fail to do this you will soon become irrelevant, because some guy with a blog will start publishing the info you won't.

My father's memorial service is Nov. 19 at 3 p.m. in the Bethlehem Chapel of the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C.

Tagged: media, obituaries


Discuss

CHERYL REIMANN, 01-14-2008

Newspapers need to pay their bills, so I see nothing wrong with charging a nominal fee for running a death notice. Why not offer a menu of choices? Nominal fee for death notice, then various charges for longer obits. One menu item should be offering the services of a newspaper reporter to write the obituary, for a set fee.

CHERI CAMPBELL, 11-04-2007

I happened on this article via the Romenesko blog. I hate to admit this, but I'm originally from Bradford, PA. My grandfather was living in Bradford at the time of his death in 1998. I recall paying nearly $100 to the local newspapers (the aforementioned Era had a $50 fee for the full obit, including survivors & career, while the Olean (NY) Times Herald charged $40 for the same obituary. If the Era is now charging additional prices for the so-called "deluxe" obit, which I would argue is hardly deluxe - well, that's sinking to an all-new low for them. I have to point out that the Era was at least part-owned for a few years by none other than Conrad Black. Make of that what you will.

GEOFF DOUGHERTY (THE EDITOR), 11-02-2007

Interesting points all around. I think newspapers should aspire to a level of business ethics and community service that far exceeds what funeral homes do. Anyone who wonders why I feel that way should read Jessica Mitford's "The American Way of Death."

Are newspapers struggling financially because the product got worse? Or did the product get worse because of the financial struggles?

There's been some interesting research on that, which generally points to the idea that newspapers with better content have better financial results.

I'd argue that running full obits for community members falls under 'better content.'

JWG, 11-01-2007

I'm also saddened by your loss.
I work at a small family owned newspaper and hold the position of ad director. Most newspapers in this country are dealing with cutting cost and finding new revenue streams. I think a free small death notice is due any family in the newspaper's community. I do find it interesting that many people choose not to subscribe to the vary paper they want so many free items posted. They are so taken back when any cost is attached. Lets see, we charge churches, civic groups and even schools to run ads of public interest. Why shouldn't obits fall into the same thinking. The cost to publish a newspaper is ever increaseing. Remember it is a private business and needs to turn a profit. Without this concern for being profitable they simply close, then where are the obits, gone to all. Oh yea employees also need to know they have a future where they work and again that means finding revenue. Funeral homes do not seem to have any problems charging for al kinds of services, now do they!

KOB, 10-31-2007

Condolences on your lost.

Regarding paid obits ... The newspaper I worked for, a daily in a New England small industrial city, began charging for obits in the mid-1990s.

The prevailing feeling was that a free obit was a small way to honor a person whom, more often than not, had been a longtime reader.

But on the other side, was declining print advertising revenues and layoffs that had already cost several reporters their jobs.

Since the funeral homes typically dealt with the newspaper, collected all the information from the family and then called in the obit details to the newspaper, it was felt by management that the cost would be largely invisible to the families and included as part of the overall charge by the funeral home.

This was a family-owned newspaper. It was sold to chain which today is in debt with a declining stock price. Circulation declines continue year to year. What impact did the decision to charge for obits have in all of this? I have no way of knowing.

STEVE OUTING, 10-31-2007

Geoff: First, I'm sorry for your loss. My dad died of a heart attack 2 years ago, and as a journalist, I had the same reaction of disgust at how obituaries are handled by newspapers today. I have an online perspective on this, and wrote about it when I was at the Poynter Institute:
http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=89873

H.L. MENCKEN, 10-31-2007

If you're working for a newspaper, and you routinely see the newshole in the metro section disappear because of too many obituaries (because they're free, they're considered editorial space), you might think it better for the paper to charge for them and count the space as advertising. Basic obits are important as public information, but the details of most people's lives are not newsworthy--in life or in death--and a death is no reason to suspend the news judgment that reporters and editors exercise in every other part of the newspaper.

GEOFF DOUGHERTY (THE EDITOR), 10-30-2007

Mike - I've worked at more small dailies than I care to admit, and some of them in the not too distant past.

We ran obits for community members. Of course there were rules, just like there are for other news stories. If people wanted to write their own obit, we directed them to the death notices. But we didn't expect people to pay for what should be a basic public-service function.

I'm sure you're correct that this has been a common development among small papers; I'm equally sure that it's a terribly offensive development.


MIKE PETERSON, 10-30-2007

Maybe you have to work the small papers to understand the nuts-and-bolts of the total operation, but this is neither new nor should it be controversial. As a reporter at a 22,000 daily, I had to take obits from the local funeral homes. They were news, they were free, they had rules: Name, birthdate, parents, education, career, survivors, predeceased, funeral time and place. And the survivors had to be members of the immediate family to be named -- we'd give the number of grandchildren, but not their names. And no hobbies.

When we switched to paid obits, there was a howl from the public, until they realized that now they could say whatever they wanted. If Uncle Charlie's greatest pleasure was fishing with his dog, Beau, that can be in the obit. More to the point, if he raised his grandson Jason, Jason could have his name in the obit. And so could Uncle Joe, who Uncle Charlie partnered with after his divorce. And people don't just die anymore -- now they can go home to be with the Lord.

People quickly came to prefer the freedom to create their own memorials to their family members, freed from the control of the copy desk.

I'm sorry you didn't know this. It happened nearly 20 years ago.

GEOFF DOUGHERTY (THE EDITOR), 10-30-2007

On a good day, obits represent some of the best writing and most valuable service a newspaper produces.

I worked at the Times in the 1990s, and I'm convinced Nelson Poynter was right about a lot of things, and definitely about this one.

RHYDER MCCLURE, 10-30-2007

As a long time obit reader, I could not agree more. Although I live in New York City, I grew up in St. Petersburg, Florida, home of the St. Petersburg Times, a well respected publication. I read the obits in the St. Pete Times daily ... and have been thoroughly put off by what they have recently begun doing with them. Nelson Poynter, who owned and ran the paper for decades, decreed that every resident would have a free obit. That decree seems to have been forgotten, as they now publish abysmal, do-it-yourself obits that seem to cost by the line.
Poynter was right - a decent obituary is a service every newspaper should provide ... and it should not seem like a last gasp (or grasp) at making a profit. It's actions like these that insure the demise of newspapers in general ... and, less and less, I will miss them.

Regards,
Rhyder McClure
New York City

Please log in or register to post your comment.

44